High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 11 GUJ CK 0040

Lakshmansingh Bhanvarsingh Rajput Through His Brother Bhagavatsingh Bhanvarsingh Rajput vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 29 November 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H.Vora, J
CASE NUMBER
R/Special Civil Application No. 19830 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 224 words

S.H.Vora, J

1.

By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner apprehends his detention under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short, the PASA Act) on account of registration of F.I.R/s. as described in para 2 of the petition.

2.

According to the petitioner, except registration of the aforementioned FIR/s, no other material is available with the competent authority to detain the petitioner under the provisions of the PASA Act.

3.

Upon perusal of the F.I.R/s., it appears that the petitioner apprehends his detention on account of registration of solitary offence under Prohibition Act and therefore, apprehension of the petitioner is well-founded and liberty of the petitioner is required to be protected.

4.

Hence, Rule. Learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.

5.

It is made clear that the petitioner is protected only in respect of the FIR/s as mentioned in the aforementioned para. The competent authority is at liberty to take suitable action against the petitioner in respect of offences, other than mentioned in the said para, if any, registered and incriminating materials found to detain the petitioner. The learned A.G.P. is directed to place on record the detention order, if any, passed against the petitioner for Court's perusal. Direct service is permitted.