High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 06 P&H CK 0065

Lakhwinder Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 23 June 2014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Narain Raina, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Crl. Misc. No. M-20968 of 2014

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 340 words

Rajiv Narain Raina, J.—The present petition has been filed u/s 482 Cr. P.C. for directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to grant security to the petitioners against the imminent danger and threat of elimination from respondents No. 4 to 7.

2.

It has been pleaded that the petitioner No. 1 is major and his date of birth is 03.09.1992 as per Matriculation Examination Certificate issued by Punjab School Education Board (Annexure P-1). The date of birth of petitioner No. 2 is 29.05.1993 as per School Certificate issued by the Education Department Punjab, (SCERT) (Annexure P-2). It has been averred that the petitioners have got married on 17.06.2014 as per Sikh rites and ceremonies at Gurudwara Sahibzada Fateh Singh, Nagar Masol, District Mohali and copies of marriage certificate and photographs are appended as Annexures P-3 & P-4, respectively. The said marriage is opposed by the private respondents and the petitioners had given a representation dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Tarn Taran-respondent No. 2 with a prayer to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

3.

After hearing counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the validity of the marriage and the age of the petitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another, , the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to look into the matter and take necessary action in accordance with law and provide protection, if required.

4.

This order, however, shall not be construed to mean that the petitioners were of marriageable age at the time of their marriage or that the marriage is legal as per laws applicable to the parties. This order is not intended to put the imprimatur of this Court on the validity of marriage and is limited to protection of the personal liberty of citizens protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

5.

Petition stands disposed of.