High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 SHI CK 0279

Lakhanpal Fabricators vs Union of India (UOI) and Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 31 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surjit Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Case No. 94 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 197 words

Surjit Singh, J.—Reply filed. Be taken on record.

2.

Heard and gone through the record.

3.

Petitioner approached the Director General of Border Roads Organization, for appointment of an Arbitrator, in terms of Clause 70 of the agreement, copy Annexure C-1, which was executed between the Petitioner and the Respondents, in relation to the work awarded to the Petitioner, under the aforesaid agreement. Arbitrator having not been appointed within time limited by law, Petitioner approached this Court, u/s 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. After filing of the present petition, Respondents have appointed Col. S.S. Pathania, as Arbitrator.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the very man, who has been appointed as Arbitrator by the Respondents may be appointed by the order of the Court also, so that on transfer of that man, who happens to be a functionary of Board Roads Organization, Respondents or the Director General, Border Roads Organization, may not appoint the person coming in his place.

5.

In view of the aforesaid apprehension, it is ordered that Col. S.S. Pathania, Director (Contracts), Project Deepak, shall remain Arbitrator, until the matter is finally adjudicated upon by him.

Petition stands disposed of.