Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1997) 01 SC CK 0066

Lachmandas Mathuradas vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 16 January 1997 · Citation: (2002) 254 ITR 799

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. C. Agrawal, J · G. T. Nanavati, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3645 of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 394 words
1.

This appeal arises out of the income tax Reference No. 54 of 1978 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lachhman Das Mathura Das, , wherein the income tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, had referred the following questions to the Allahabad High Court for opinion (page 413) :

"1. Whether, the Tribunal was in law justified in allowing the assessee's claim in respect of interest on the arrears of sales tax in computing the asses-see's income for the year under consideration ?

2.

Whether, the interest on the outstanding balance of sales tax was an allowable deduction under the income tax Act ?

3.

Whether there was material on record justifying the Tribunal's finding that the liability of Rs. 69,383 for damages had crystallised in the accounting period relevant to the assessment year under consideration ?

4.

Whether the claim of the assessee for damages could be held to be an allowable deduction computing the assessee's income liable to assessment for the year under consideration ?"

2.

The Allahabad High Court by its impugned judgment dated January 28, 1980, has answered the said questions against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Hence, this appeal.

3.

While granting special leave to appeal the appeal has been confined to questions Nos. 1 and 2 only. The High Court has proceeded on the basis that the interest on arrears of sales tax is penal in nature and has rejected the contention of the assessee that it is compensatory in nature. In taking the said view, the High Court has placed reliance on its Full Bench decision in Saraya Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd., Gorakhpur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, . Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-assessee states that the said judgment of the Full Bench has been reversed by the larger Bench of the High Court in Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, , wherein it has been held that interest on arrears of tax is compensatory in nature and not penal. This question has also been considered by this court in Civil Appeal No. 830 of 1979 titled Saraya Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, decided on February 29, 1996. In that view of the matter, the appeal is allowed and questions Nos. 1 and 2 are answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. No order as to costs.