Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 04 SC CK 0213

L. Srinivasa Reddy and Others vs The Mandal Revenue Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 28 April 2000 · Citation: (2000) 7 JT 535

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.N. Phukan, J · S. Rajendra Babu, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No''s. 3081-3083 of 2000 (Arising out of SLP (C) No''s. 18932-18934 of 1999)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 308 words
1.

Delay condoned.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

This is a claimant''s appeal arising out of land acquisition proceeding. A certain extent of land in the village Anugonda was acquired for providing house sites to the weaker sections of the society. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 13,000 per acre.

Being dissatisfied with this award on a reference u/s 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, the Reference Court affirmed the award of the Land Acquisition Officer. Thereafter, the matter was carried in appeal to the High Court. The High Court noticed that there was hardly any evidence before the Court to come to the conclusion one way or the other. However, by adopting capitalisation method, on which there is some evidence, the compensation was fixed at Rs. 22,000/- per acre by enhancing the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, as affirmed by the Reference Court.

4.

We do not think the approach of the High Court in this matter is satisfactory. If as stated by the High Court there was no evidence to determine the compensation, the proper course for the High Court was to have remitted the matter to the concerned authority to adduce evidence in that regard and then determined appropriate compensation or on th.3 available material should have examined the matter and determined appropriate compensation. Now neither of these courses having been adopted by the High Court, we have no other option but to set aside the order made by the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court to examine in the light of the evidence adduced by the parties before the Reference Court and to determine the appropriate compensation or to adopt any other course. The appeals are allowed accordingly. Considering the nature and circumstances of the case there will be ho order as to costs.