High CourtsDivision Bench(2009) 10 KAR CK 0027

K.Y. Mylarasetty and Others vs K.S. Basappa and Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 9 October 2009 · Citation: (2010) 1 KarLJ 262

HON’BLE JUDGES
N. Kumar, J · C.R. Kumaraswamy, J
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal No. 242 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 280 words

N. Kumar, J.—This is a defendants appeal. Plaintiffs filed a suit for a declaration that the trust deed dated 19-2-1983 is void and for a direction to defendants 1, 4 to 8 who are the trustees, not to act as trustees of the trust and meddle with the properties of the Youth League Charitable Trust and for a comprehensive scheme of the management of the properties of the trust. After contest the suit came to be decreed as prayed for. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants have preferred this appeal.

2.

During the pendency of the appeal, some of the original parties are dead. At the intervention of the well-wishers of Kadur Town/both the warring parties have amicably settled all the disputes and have now formed a society and got the same registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 in which all of them are given an opportunity to participate. In view of the same, setting out the terms and conditions of the compromise, they have filed a compromise petition. It is duly signed by the parties and the respective Counsel.

3.

We have gone through the compromise. It is lawful. The sum and substance of the compromise is that all the properties which belonged to erstwhile trust, would now become the properties of the newly formed society and the parties to the proceedings who are accommodated as members and office-bearers of the trust, would manage these properties in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, we pass the following:

ORDER

Learned Counsel for the parties admit due execution of this compromise petition by the parties. Hence, appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition.