High CourtsDivision Bench(1938) 04 MAD CK 0010

K.V. Venkataramanier and Another vs Varadarajulu Chetty

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 April 1938 · Citation: (1938) 2 MLJ 360

HON’BLE JUDGES
Burn, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 123 words

Burn, J.—I am unable to accept this reference. With all respect to King, J., I am unable to follow the reasoning in In Re: Rajaratnam Pillai, ,

Criminal Procedure Code, is concerned with extra-judicial information, knowledge or suspicion and it has nothing (in my opinion) to do with

knowledge gathered by a. Magistrate in open Court from the evidence of witnesses given during a trial. If a Magistrate begins a trial as a Summons

Case and then finds that an offence triable only under Warrant Case procedure has been committed, he is, I think, bound to apply Warrant Case

procedure thenceforward and he is not in any way disqualified from proceeding with the trial. Let the papers be returned and the case proceed.