High CourtsDivision Bench(1927) 02 MAD CK 0005

K.V. Sundara Ramaiyer and Others vs Sathianathan alias Vengappa Chetty and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 February 1927 · Citation: 102 Ind. Cas. 28

HON’BLE JUDGES
Odgers, J · Madhavan Nair, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 178 words
1.

The preliminary point that no appeal lies must prevail. There was no remand here under Order XLI, Rule 23 of the CPC though, the District

Judge refers to this in his judgment. It is a remand u/s 151 of the CPC as has been held recently in Balla Mallayya Vs. Peddi Veerayya and Others,

and other cases.

2.

The District Munsif did not decide the suit on any preliminary point but on the whole of the issues raised; after an ex parte decree is set aside

and the suit remanded for trial. Sadhu Krishna Aiyar v. Kuppan Ayyangar 20 M.P 54 : 1 M.L.T. 268 : 16 M.L.J. 479 is authority for the

proposition that the remand is not under Order XLI Rule 23. The learned Vakil for the appellant desires to argue this on the footing of a Civil

Revision Petition. This cannot be done. Cf., Balla Mallayya Vs. Peddi Veerayya and Others,

3.

The appeal is dismissed with costs of 3rd defendant. The memorandum of objections is not pressed and must be dismissed with costs.