High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 02 MAD CK 0014

Kuppusami Mudaliar vs Doraisami Mudaliar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 February 1909 · Citation: 4 Ind. Cas. 1125

HON’BLE JUDGES
Munro, J · Abdur Rahim, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

We are of opinion that the time was not of the essence of the stipulation that the bonds and decree should be transferred to the 1st plaintiff. We

do not think that the mere fact that the first defendant was either to transfer the bonds, etc., in two months or pay the amounts due under them;

shows that time was the essence of the contract. The cases to which we have been referred are cases of mercantile contracts in which prima facie

time is of the essence of the contract. If the first defendant has, in fact, executed and produced in Court the necessary transfers as he alleges, we

think the transfer should be accepted.

2.

We, therefore, reverse the order of the district Judge and remand the petition for disposal according to law. Costs will abide the event.