High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 12 P&H CK 1898

Kunal vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Namit Kumar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 35411 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 177 words

Namit Kuumar, J

1.

By way of present writ petitionn, petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing responddents No.2 and 3 to decide the charge-sheet dated 11.05.2023 (Annexure P-1), pending against him under Rule 8 of thhe Punjab Civil Services (Punisshment & Appeal) Rules, 1970,, expeditiouslly.

2.

On the last date of hearing i.e. 29.11.2025, the following order was passed:-

“On receipt of advancce copy of the petition, Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan,, D.A.G., Punjab has put in appearance on behalf of the reespondents-State and seeks time to get instructions with regard to the status of the chargesheet and in how much time, the same shall be concluded.

Adjourned to 05.12.20255.”

3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Jagroop Singh, Senior Assistant, Food and Supplies Department, Punjab, who is present in Court, submits that the inquiry proceedings against the petitioner shall be concluded within a period of four months from today.

4.

In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.

5.

Dismissed as not pressed.