AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 79 words
1.
We agree with the Subordinate Judge that no consideration for the deed of assignment Exhibit A has been proved, and that it was not necessary
for the plaintiffs to sue for the cancellation of that instrument as they do not claim as heirs of their grandfather, but in their independent right as
coparceners in the property which he attempted to wrongly alienate Unni v. Kunchi Amma I.L.R.14 M. 26.
2.
The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.