High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 10 P&H CK 0175

Kuldeep Bansal vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 October 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.43091 of 2018 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 554 words

This is the 3rd petition preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking benefit of regular bail to the petitioner pending trial in case FIR No. 21 dated

25.02.2017 registered under Sections 326, 148, 149 IPC and offence u/s 307 IPC was added later on registered at Police Station Model Town, District

Hoshiarpur.

Counsel for the parties have been heard.

Briefly, it may be noticed that FIR came to be registered on the statement of Bhupinder Singh in relation to an occurrence dated 25.02.2017.

As per prosecution version alleged occurrence is stated to have been captured in a CCTV camera. Learned State counsel on instructions would

submit that the complainant had produced the CD of the occurrence before the

IO and who after playing of the CD had made the following report:-

“In the CD and the photographs, one person is seen sitting on the motorcycle wearing light blue dress and he is Harpreet Singh @ Happy. The

person wearing black shirt is Kuldip Bansal @ Vicky, who is armed with kirpan. The person wearing red shirt is Harwinder Singh @ Sonu, who is

armed with kirpan and the person wearing white shirt is

Baljit Singh @ Jyoti, who is also armed with kirpan. On watching the CD, the persons namely Harwinder Singh @ Sonu and Baljit Singh @ Jyoti along

with Kuldip Bansal started giving kirpan blows, the moment the complainant came out of the shop and he immediately took his scooter towards the

shop and in the meantime, Harwinder Singh @ Sonu and Baljit Singh @ Jyoti gave kirpan blows hitting him on his left side, while kuldip Bansal gave

blows towards his right side and the kirpan blows given by Kuldip Bansal hit the right hand of the complainant and thereby amputating his right thumb.

Thus, kuldip Bansal his responsible for the amputation of the right thumb of the complainant.â€​

As per report reproduced hereinabove, the present petitioner is alleged to be armed with a kirpan and having inflicted the kirpan blow on the right hand

of the injured Bhupinder Singh and which has resulted into the amputation of the right thumb.

As per report of IO, other co-accused namely Harwinder Singh @ Sonu and Baljit Singh @ Jyoti had also inflicted kirpan blows upon the injured

which had hit on the left side.

Strangely, the MLR placed on record of injured Bhupinder Singh reflects only one injury i.e. amputation of right thumb.

Petitioner was arrested on 13.04.2017.

Investigation in the case having been completed, challan was presented and even charges have been framed.

Trial has not gathered pace inasmuch as learned State counsel informs the Court that out of 23 prosecution witnesses cited only one has been

examined till date.

Keeping in view the length of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and the discrepancy noticed hereinabove as regards the report of the IO based

upon the CCTV footage as opposed to the MLR of injured-Bhupinder Singh reflecting a solitary injury, petitioner is held entitled to the benefit of bail.

Petitioner be enlarged on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

It is, however, clarified that the observations made in this order are only confined to examining the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail and would

have no bearing on the merit of the case.

Disposed of.