AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Sharad Kumar Gupta, J
Heard counsel for the parties.
Deputy Advocate General adopted the reply of the writ petition filed in W.P.(S) No. 4254 of 2018.
In para No. 7 of the reply it has been stated that the impugned order Annexure P/1 dated 05/06/2018 is nonest, ab initio and cannot be sustained. In para No. 9 the averment is that the instant petition be disposed of with liberty to the answering respondents to reach to a final conclusion after adherence to the principles of natural justice, opportunity of hearing etc. to the petitioner or such directions, observation etc. as deemed fit by the Hon'ble Court.
Counsel for the petitioners is agreed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the averments of para Nos. 7 and 9 of the reply of the respondents.
Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, Annexure P/1 dated 05/06/2018 is set-aside with liberty to the respondents to give a final conclusion after adherence to the principles of natural justice, opportunity of hearing etc. to the petitioners.
With this direction the instant writ petition is disposed of.