High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 06 MAD CK 0454

K.U. Sundarabalan Pettai vs Director of Rural Development, The District Collector of Ramanathapuram, Additional Collector cum Project Director (Rural Development) and The Block Development Officer

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 June 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
D. Hariparanthaman, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 4631 of 2006 and M.P. (MD) No. 1 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 163 words

D. Hariparanthaman, J.—According to the writ Petitioner, he has done the work of black topping in double layer for the Govindamangalam and Anandur Road in R.S.Mangalam Panchayat Union to an extent of 2 kilometers in the year 1993-1994. For the afore-said work, the Petitioner was yet to be paid an amount of Rs. 1,15,745/-and this amount is claimed in this writ petition based on the revised estimate.

2.

The fourth Respondent filed counter affidavit stating that the Petitioner was not at all given the contract of laying down the road. It is also stated that there was No. order accepting any revised estimate.

3.

Disputed questions of facts have arisen in this case and this Court could not go into the disputed question of facts. The judicial review in matters involving contracts are very limited. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. Since the writ petition is dismissed, the application seeking to implead the Road Inspector after hearing the matter is rejected. No. costs.