High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 03 MAD CK 0126

Krishnan vs Sub-Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Dhandapani, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 4764 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 482 words

M.Dhandapani, J

1.

The petitioner/A1, who is facing trial for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 326 and 324 r/w 34 of IP, in C.C.No.171 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, in Crime No.433 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the case is of the year 2012. Earlier, the petitioner was arrested and released on bail. Thereafter, the petitioner did not appear before the trial Court. Hence, Non Bailable warrant was issued on 20.05.2022 and pursuant to which, the petitioner was arrested on 09.12.2023.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that due to the death of his father, he was unable to appear before the concerned Court and pursuant to the non bailable warrant issued, he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.12.2023. He would further submit that the petitioner is willing to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court and accordingly, he prays for bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that apart from this case, there are six previous cases pending against the petitioner and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there will be no progress in the trial. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, and on further conditions that:

(a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on all hearing dates without fail;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.