High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 02 MAD CK 0006

K.P. Mohammed vs Collector of Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam and Gudalur Town Panchayat

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 February 2002

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Jayasimha Babu, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 8680 of 1996 and W.P.M.P. No. 11952 of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 290 words

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.—The order impugned is one issued u/s 217-J of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920. That Section is

applicable only to lands in hill stations. Petitioner''s contention is that Gudalur was not a hill station not having been notified as such u/s 3(10) of the

Act, which enables the State Government to notify as hill stations places other than those mentioned in Schedule II of the Act. The places

mentioned in Schedule II in the original Act are Ottacamund and Coonoor, both of which are in Nilgiri District. Though Gudalur is also in Nilgiri

District, it is not one of the places mentioned in Schedule II of the Act.

2.

Counsel says that Gudalur was notified as ''hill station'' in the year 1998 Counsel for the Municipality is unable to controvert that. Counsel for the

petitioner referred to the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 15646 of 1995, in which, reference is made to G.O.Ms.

No. 151 of the Municipal Administration Department dated 20.8.1998, under which, Nelliyalam Town Panchayat has been notified and declared

as ''hill station'' besides other places. Counsel says that Gudalur is one of the other places mentioned in that notification.

3.

As the respondents are not in a position to controvert that statement of the petitioner, and have not filed any other notification under which

Gudalur had been declared as hill station prior to the date of the impugned order, the impugned order is set aside. The writ petition is allowed.

4.

Liberty, however, is reserved to the respondents to take action against the petitioner, if there is any cause for the same and in accordance with

law. Consequently, W.M.P. No. 11952 of 1996 is dismissed.