High CourtsSingle Bench(1922) 10 MAD CK 0017

Kothandarama Reddy and Another vs Jagathambal Ammal

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 October 1922 · Citation: AIR 1923 Mad 229 : 71 Ind. Cas. 32 : (1922) 16 LW 924

HON’BLE JUDGES
Krishan, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 144 words

Krishan, J.—To apply the Act XIX of 1841 to any particular case it is a condition precedent that the Judge should find or be satisfied that

the applicant was likely to be materially prejudiced if left to the ordinary remedy of a regular suit and that the application, was made bona fide. See

Section 3 of Act XIX of 1841. There is no finding here by the Court that these conditions are fulfilled. Without that finding, the Court had no

jurisdiction to act under the Act and its order is revisable; See Bapamma v. Collector of Godavari 12 M. 341 : 4 Ind. Ded. 587.

2.

The revision has been confined by the petitioners to B and C schedule properties only. The order of the lower Court with regard to these

properties is set aside. Each party will bear his or their own costs.