High CourtsDivision Bench(1945) 01 MAD CK 0039

Kothandarama Mudaly vs Dharmalinga Mudaly and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 January 1945 · Citation: AIR 1945 Mad 264 : (1945) 1 MLJ 186

HON’BLE JUDGES
Byers, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 152 words

Byers, J.—The Court had no jurisdiction to order a stay u/s 6(2) of the Indian Soldiers'' Litigation Act. It is clear from the wording of this

section that the powers of the Court are limited to suspending the proceedings, after which it must give notice in the prescribed manner to the

prescribed authority and then proceed u/s 7 of the Act, under which it is necessary before ordering a stay to find that the soldier is serving under

special conditions, and that a postponement is necessary in the interests of justice. Stay of proceedings does not automatically follow merely on

receipt of a notice from the Collector u/s 6(1) of the Act.

2.

In the result, the revision is accepted the order of the lower Court is set aside, and the matter is remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with

the provisions of the Act, the costs being costs in the cause.