High CourtsDivision Bench(1891) 10 MAD CK 0020

Kothandapani vs Somasundaram and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 October 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 97

HON’BLE JUDGES
Parker, J · Muttusami Ayyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 171 words
1.

The learned Judges of the Small Cause Court have given no reasons for their decision.

2.

The right to sue to recover a debt is in the nature of a common law right, and unless it is taken away either expressly or by necessary implication,

it must be treated as subsisting. We are not referred to any Section in the Indian Companies Act under which we can support the decision of the

learned Judges. Section 177, which enumerates the consequences of the voluntary winding up of a company, only recognizes the liability of the

liquidators to pay the debts of the company and limits the right of creditors to a payment pari passu. It does not absolve the debtors from liability to

be sued. The fact that there are liquidators may be material if execution is sought of the decree. We set aside the order and direct that the suit be

restored to the file and disposed of in accordance with law. The costs will be costs in the cause.