High CourtsSingle Bench(1927) 11 MAD CK 0001

Komaragiri Bitchalugadu vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 November 1927 · Citation: AIR 1928 Mad 479 : 108 Ind. Cas. 901

HON’BLE JUDGES
Devadoss, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 176 words

Devadoss, J.—This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Guntur recommending the quashing of the conviction of the accused u/s 34 (6)

of the Criminal Tribes Act VI of 1924, u/s 24 (b) it a member of a registered criminal tribe is found in any place under such circumstances as to

satisfy the Court that he was waiting for an opportunity to commit theft or robbery, he shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may

extend to three years etc, All the evidence against the accused is that he was found near a pond and that he had a pair of scissors and a box of

matches. I do not think this would in any way amount to an offence u/s 24 (6). As the Sessions Judge has rightly remarked, the facts proved do not

make out that the accused was waiting for an opportunity to commit theft or robbery. I, therefore, set aside the conviction and sentence of the

accused and direct his immediate release if he has not been already released.