Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 07 NCLT CK 3693

Kolmar Group AG vs Vikas Gautamchand Jain RP of Sona Alloys Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 31 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shammi Khan, Member (Judicial) · Ajai Das Mehrotra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
IA/55(AHM)2022 in CP(IB) 586 of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 354 words

ORDER

The case is fixed for pronouncement of order.

The order is pronounced in open Court vide separate sheet.

ORDER

1.

This application has been filed by the applicant regarding partial rejection of its claim by the Resolution Professional during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of Corporate Debtor Sona Alloys Private Ltd. As against the claim of Rs.56,12,48,775/-, Resolution Professional had admitted claim of Rs.31,35,22,981/-.

2.

We have gone through the submissions of the applicant and respondent. It is apparent from the record that Resolution Professional had allowed the claim based on the audited books of accounts of the Corporate Debtor. In his reply, Resolution Professional had brought out that there was a debit note on 31.03.2014, duly recorded in the books of accounts of the Corporate Debtor, which has been ignored by the applicant while filing its claim. He has also submitted that as far back as 2016, applicant had agreed and accepted to receive an amount of USD 40,00,000/- against total outstanding dues.

3.

The resolution plan has been approved by the Adjudicating Authority vide its order dated 06.02.2023.

4.

The claim has been admitted by the Resolution Professional based on the records of the Corporate Debtor, including audited books of accounts. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Another vs. Union of India & Ors. (Civil Original / Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition (Civil) No.99 of 2018 that Resolution Professional is given administrative as opposed to quasi-judicial powers. Relevant portion of the said judgement is extracted below:

“59… It is clear from a reading of these Regulations that the Resolution Professional is given administrative as opposed to quasi-judicial powers. In fact, even when the Resolution Professional is to make a determination under Regulation 35A, he is only to apply to the Adjudicating Authority for appropriate relief…”

5.

Resolution Professional had admitted the claim of Rs. 31,35,22,981/- based on the records and audited books of accounts of the Corporate Debtor and his action in doing so cannot be faulted with.

6.

As sequel to the above discussion, application is rejected and disposed of.