High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 KL CK 0272

K.K. Praveen And Ors vs J.M. Financial Asset Reconstruction Company (P) Ltd

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 6 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Devan Ramachandran, J
CASE NUMBER
Original Petition (DRT) No. 106 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 407 words
1.

The petitioners have approached this Court with a singular plea that the Debts Recovery Tribunal-1, Ernakulam, be directed to take up and dispose

of Exts.P5 and P6 interlocutory applications at the earliest and at least, on the next posting date, which he says is 18.03.2021.

2.

When this matter was considered by this Court on an earlier occasion, a doubt was raised as to whether the DRT-I, Ernakulam is functioning and

therefore, a report was called for from it through the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The presiding officer of the DRT has now furnished a report

before this Court, which reads as under:

“It is for kind information of Hon'ble High Court that all matters of DRT-1 are being taken up for hearing through videoconferencing

since December, 2020. I am also having additional charge of DRT-2 Ernakulam as per the notification No.F.No.7/1/2019- DRT dated

10.07.2020 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance. Accordingly, I have been hearing the matters of DRT-1 as regular presiding

officer and DRT-2 Ernakulam having additional charge, through videoconferencing as well as through physical appearance of learned

counsel for parties in cases where the request for physical hearing is made by learned counsel for the parties.

I am also hearing all the matters which have already been adjourned due to COVID- 19 situation as and when an application to advance

the hearing of matter is filed befor the Tribunal. However, no such application has been filed before me in this particular case. I shall hear

and decide the instant matter within the time frame as Hon'ble High Court directs.â€​

3.

As is evident from the above, the DRT has now taken a stand that no application has been filed by the petitioners for hearing of the applications out

of turn nor has an “advance hearing applicationâ€​ been filed.

4.

I therefore, asked Sri.Babu Cherukara, whether his client intends to approach the DRT in such manner, to which he answered in affirmative.

In the afore circumstances, I order this original petition to the limited extent of allowing the petitioners to move an application for early hearing of

Exts.P5 and P6 before the DRT-I, Ernakulam; in which event, the said Tribunal will consider the same and dispose of the said petitions on its merits,

as expeditiously as is possible but not later than three months from the date on which the application is filed by the petitioners in terms of this

judgment.