High CourtsSingle Bench(2016) 01 OHC CK 0048

Kishore Chandra Mallick vs State of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 8 January 2016 · Citation: (2016) 1 OriLR 535

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Mishra, J.
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
ABLAPL No. 18388 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 245 words

S.K. Mishra, J.—1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate. The petitioner is apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offences under Section 342, 323 and 325/34 of the I.P.C. read with Section 3(2) (vii) of the S.C. & S.T. (P.A.) Act in G.R. Case No. 790 of 2015 of the Court of J.M.F.C. (R), Cuttack, arising out of Olatpur P.S. Case No. 47 of 2015.

2.

It is apparent from the records that offences under Sections 342, 323 and 325/34 are bailable in nature. Section 3(2) (vii) of the S.C. & S.T. (P.A.) Act alleging that the petitioner is a public servant (working as a Constable) such offence is attracted. A careful consideration of Section 3(2) (vii) Act reveals that it shall be attracted if a public servant commits an offence under Section 3 of the said Act. There is no allegation that he has not committed any such offence. Section 3(2) (vii) is not made out against the present petitioner. Hence, bar under Section 18 of the Act is not applicable.

3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid consideration and the fact of the case, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. It is directed that on the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the Arresting Officer.

4.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.