High CourtsDivision Bench(1931) 04 MAD CK 0027

(Kilaru) Gangaiya and Another vs (Kilaru) China Lingaiya

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 April 1931 · Citation: AIR 1933 Mad 162 : 145 Ind. Cas. 529

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pandalai, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 83 words

Pandalai, J.—The partition list is not an instrument of partition within the meaning of Section 2(15), Stamp Act, because it did not itself effect

any division as the agreement for a subsequent stamped and registered instrument shows, but was an agreement for effecting a future partition on

the terms agreed. The document is liable to stamp duty and penalty as an agreement under Article 4, Schedule 1(a), Madras Act 6 of 1922. The

order of the District Munsif is varied accordingly. No costs.