High CourtsFull Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0102

Khadersa Hajee Bappu vs Puthen Veettil Ayissa Dmmah and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 March 1910 · Citation: (1911) ILR (Mad) 511

HON’BLE JUDGES
Munro, J · Miller, J · Abdur Rahim, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 81 words

Benson and Krishnaswami Ayyar, JJ.

4.

The Full Bench has decided that Article 144 and not Article 123 of the Limitation Act applies. We cannot decide whether on the facts of this case the suit is barred under Article 144. In accordance with the opinion of the Full Bench, we reverse the decree of the lower Appellate Court and remand the case to the District Court for disposal according to law. The costs will be provided for in the revised decree.