High Courts(1896) 10 MAD CK 0013

Khadar Hussain vs Muhammad Hussain Sahib and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 October 1896 · Citation: (1897) 7 MLJ 52

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 137 words
1.

In the circumstances stated we think there can be no doubt that Article 12(a) of the Limitation Act cannot properly be applied to the suit

brought by the plaintiff.

2.

Whatever was the intention of the parties who took part in the execution sale, that transaction could not affect the title of the plaintiff, and

therefore It was not necessary for him to have the sale set aside.

3.

We cannot agree with the decision in Suryanna v. Duryi ILR (1888) M. 258 which was also a case of a sale in execution of a decree.

4.

In accordance with the opinion expressed by the Full Bench, the Division Bench (The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Benson) set aside the

decree of the lower appellate Court and remanded the appeal for disposal in accordance with law.