High CourtsDivision Bench(1920) 02 CAL CK 0058

Keramatulla Meah and Another vs Keamatulla Meah, on his Death his heiress and Widow Substituted in his Place, Chetunnessa Bibi and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 27 February 1920 · Citation: 57 Ind. Cas. 710

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shamsul Huda, J · Richardson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 116 words
1.

This Rule is discharged. It relates to a matter which was outside the scope of the appeal preferred to this Court. The learned Vakil for the opposite party has, therefore, contended that the question raised of the amendment of the decree so as to bring it into conformity with the judgment of the Court below is one for that Court, and we are disposed to accept that view.

2.

Let the judgment and decree filed along with the application be returned to the petitioner''s Vakil.

3.

Costs of this Rule will abide the result of any similar application which may be made in the Court below. We assess the hearing fee at one gold mohur.