High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 09 DEL CK 1986

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs Kripanand Narwaria & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 September 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Navin Chawla, J · Madhu Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 13877/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 217 words

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 56860/2025 (Exemption)

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 13877/2025 & CM APPL. 56859/2025

2.

This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 22.04.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 448/2023, titled Kripanand Narwaria v. Union of India and Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the said O.A. filed by the respondents herein with the following directions:

“10.

In view of aforesaid, both the OAs are hereby allowed with the following observations:-

(i)

The applicant will be treated as beneficiary under GPF cum Pension Scheme.

(ii)

The respondents may recoup the CPF with 8% simple interest per annum, and thereafter pass an appropriate order extending the coverage of the applicant under the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme

(iii)

This exercise shall be completed within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order.”

3.

The challenge raised by the petitioners is now covered by our Judgment dated 02.09.2025 passed in a batch of petitions, including W.P.(C) 3172/2019, titled Bharti Bahuguna v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., 2025:DHC:7629-DB.

4.

In view thereof, we find no merit in the present petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. The pending application is also disposed of as infructuous.