Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 03 NCLT CK 1652

Keerthan Kumar Upadhya

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 19 March 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjiv Jain, Member (Judicial) · Venkataraman Subramaniam, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CP(IB)/51(CHE)/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 460 words

This Application has been filed under Section 94(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('Code'/ 'IBC') read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtor) Rules, 2019 ('Rules') by the Applicant/ Personal Guarantor Mr. Keerthan Kumar Upadhya. The prayer made is to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Mr. Keerthan Kumar Upadhya, being the Personal Guarantor for SKV United Hospitals Limited.

2.

As per the averments made in the application, SKV United Hospitals Limited had taken credit facilities from Shreem Hreem Shreem Holdings. The Applicant herein had given personal guarantee to the said loans. The Corporate Debtor failed to repay the debts and in pursuance of which the present application has been filed.

3.

In Part-III of the application, the Applicant has given the particulars of total debt, amount of debt in default, date when the debt was due, and date when the default occurred. The Part III, as provided, is extracted here below:

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
4.

The Applicant has annexed the deed of personal guarantee document and letter invoking guarantee dated 15.09.2024 at Pages 241-245.

5.

In the present case it is observed that, the corporate Debtor had taken loan amount of Rs.75,00,000/-(Seventy Five Lakhs) and the Applicant herein provided personal guarantee to the loan amount. It is observed from the letter invoking guarantee sent by the Creditor that the Creditor has demanded the amount of Rs.75,00,000/- (Seventy-Five Lakhs Only), which is less than the threshold limit of Rs.1 Crore.

6.

The IBC, Code classifies individuals into three classes – personal guarantors to CDs, partnership firms and proprietorship firms, and other individuals, to enable the implementation of individual insolvency in a phased manner. The Central Government, vide a notification dated 15.11.2019, appointed 1st December, 2019 as the date of commencement of the provisions of the Code relating to personal guarantors to Corporate Debtor. Thus, it goes without saying that, the threshold limit to invoke Section 94, 95 of IBC, 2016, shall be same as is with respect to the corporate debtor under section 4 of the IBC,2016 i.e. 1 crore. In the present case, the defaulted amount is less than 1 Crore. Therefore, the Applicant does not meet the threshold limit of Rs 1 Crore to maintain this application under Section 94 of IBC, 2016.

7.

Further it is observed that, as per Rule 6(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019, the Applicant has not sent notice to all the financial creditors and the corporate Debtor to whom the Applicant is the personal guarantor.

8.

On the above said grounds, CP(IB)/51(CHE)/2025 stands dismissed.

9.

File be consigned to records.