High CourtsDivision Bench(1916) 08 BOM CK 0023

Kavasji Sorabji Aibada vs Bai Dinbai

Bombay High Court · Decided on 8 August 1916 · Citation: AIR 1916 Bom 315(1) : (1916) ILR (Bom) 666 : 36 Ind. Cas. 373

HON’BLE JUDGES
Heaton, J · Beaman, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 181 words
1.

An executor called upon by citation to accept or renounce is clearly compellable, if he accepts, to take out Probata within a limited time. If he does not do so, Letters of Administration with a copy of the Will annexed may be granted to any competent applicant. This is the principle of the decision in the cases of Motibhai v. Karsandas Narayandas 19 B. 123 and Bayabai Tapidas v. Damodar Tapidas 20 B. 227. The lower Court has decided this as a preliminary point against the applicant and decided it wrongly.

2.

There is a further question of fact to be answered. The opponent denies that the applicant is a beneficiary under the Will or has any interest whatever in the estate of the deceased. If that be so, he would clearly have no locus standi in any such proceedings as these. But that question must be dealt with by the learned Judge below.

3.

We set aside his order and remand the application to be disposed of in accordance with the foregoing observations.

4.

Costs to abide the result.