Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 10 ITAT CK 2588

Karmic Business Specialties Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 8 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 2395/Del/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 230 words

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, arises against the C IT(A)-5, New Delhi’s in case No. Del/CIT(A0-5/0034/2017-18 dated 21.02.2019, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 19 61 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the p arties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It transpires during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities had set into motion section 148/147 proceedings against the asse ssee to reopen the e arlier assessment dated 30.12.2016 framed in it’s case u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act.

4.

It is in this factual backdrop that the tr ibunal sought to verify as to whether the impugned reopening is based on any incr iminating material or not which found a mandatory cond ition in a search assessment settled as per hon’ble apex cour t’s landmark decision in PCIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 454 ITR 212 (SC). No satisfactory answer has come from the Revenue side since the imp ugned reopening is based on some investigations carried by the learned departmental authorities than any incriminating material found during the cour se of the search.

5.

This being the clinching factual position, the tribunal hereby seeks no merit in the learned lo wer autho rities’ action initiating the impugned reopening against the assessee. The same stands quashed in very terms.

6.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.