High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 MAD CK 0136

Karmegam vs Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Sivagnanam, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 23330 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 461 words

V. Sivagnanam, J

1.

The petitioner/sole accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.11.2023 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b),341,387 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.276 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 21.11.2023 the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded money from the defacto complainant by showing knife and when the defacto complainant refused to give money he threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence and the petitioner is in custody from 21.11.2023, hence he seeks bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded money from the defacto complainant by showing knife and when the defacto complainant refused to give money he threatened him with dire consequences, hence he objected to grant bail to the petitioner. However he fairly concedes that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration the fact that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence and also taking into consideration the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[i] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Iluppur and on further conditions that:

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on receipt of summons;

(iv)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

(v)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

(vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

vii)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.