High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 01 MAD CK 0021

Kari Chengamna and Another vs Jatti Kristnamnah and Others and Sannayala Peraya and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 January 1909 · Citation: 1 Ind. Cas. 219

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J · Benson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 55 words
1.

We are not prepared to differ from the decision in Barber Maran v. Ramana Gounden 20 M.k 461 mainly based upon the proviso to Section 38 of the Indian Contract Act, which undoubtedly supports the conclusion arrived at in that judgment.

2.

We accordingly dismiss the second appeal and the revision petition with costs.