High CourtsDivision Bench(1906) 02 MAD CK 0007

Kararam Rangiah vs Malla Chengama Naidu

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 February 1906 · Citation: 43 Ind. Cas. 55

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Aiyar, J · Moore, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 43 words
1.

The document is a bond and not a promissory note. Venku v. Sitaram 29 B. 82 : 6 Bom. L.R. 841. It consequently can be admitted in evidence

on payment of penalty and stamp duty u/s 35 (a) of the Stamp Act.