High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 P&H CK 0066

Karan Singh vs Braham Parkash and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
AMIT RAWAL, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 7949 Of 2016(O & M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 327 words

The present revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 30.07.2016(Annexure P6), whereby the application submitted by the

petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, in civil suit seeking permanent injunction,(Annexure P-3), titled as “Braham Parkash versus Dharmenderâ€,

has been dismissed.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that prior to the institution of the suit, petitioner who is the father of the parties to the

lis in the suit (Annexure P-3), had already filed a suit for declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction and arrayed both sons i.e.

Braham Parkash and Dharmender as defendant No.1 and 2, who are plaintiff and defendant in suit (Annexure P-3). It is on that account, the cause of

action arose to file the application for impleadment as the suit property is identical in both the suits and the possession of the same is with the

petitioner, thus, for all intents and purposes, the petitioner is not only proper but necessary party. Therefore, the trial Court ought to have allowed the

application.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the order declining the application is proper and justifiable as the courts below

have applied the doctrine akin to Dominus Litis.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the paper book and of the view that the best course for adjudication of the lis instead of allowing

the petitioner to be arrayed as defendant in the suit (Annexure P3) is to seek the transfer of the suit from two different Courts to be tried by one Court

together. The parties are directed to move an appropriate application before District Judge, Faridabad. If either of the parties moves an application, the

District Judge shall transfer the suit Annexure P-4, titled as “Karan Singh and another vs Braham Parkash and others†or vice versa to another

Court with a direction to decide the same together.

The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.