High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 DEL CK 0086

Karan Nayyar Alias Vicky & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 17 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 96 Of 2021, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 731 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 307 words

Suresh Kumar Kait, J

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1.

Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 1092/2015, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.

2.

Notice.

3.

Ms. Richa Kapoor, learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent

No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been duly identified to be complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this

case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4.

With the consent of both the sides, the present petition has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5.

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 was solemnized on 30.11.2010 as per Hindu

rites. However, due to different mindsets, temperaments and incompatibilities, they started living separately from 25.06.2015. Further submitted that

the matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1-husband and respondent No.2-wife stands amicably settled before Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts,

Delhi in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 26.04.2018 and decree of divorce has been already granted by the Family Court on 11.03.2020.

6.

Respondent No.2, present through video conferencing affirms that the matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved in terms of Settlement

Agreement dated 26.04.2018 reached through Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi and terms thereof have been fullyÂ

acted upon. Respondent No.2 submits that no grievance against petitioners survives and so, the FIR in question and proceedings emanating therefrom

be quashed.

7.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any

further.

8.

For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 1092/2015, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating

therefrom are hereby quashed.

9.

The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

10.

Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.