High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 SHI CK 0972

Karam Dev vs HPTDCL

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla · Decided on 12 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Execution Petition No.907 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 191 words

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

It is not in dispute that save and except revised pay scale, other admissible dues of the petitioner stand cleared. Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that arrears to the tune of Rs. 1,37,736/-, are not being released on account of pendency of the review petition filed in case of Tulsi Ram, wherein no stay has been granted against the judgment sought to be reviewed. He states that the respondent Corporation is adopting pick and choose method by releasing arrears to some of the employees and denying to others.

2.

Since learned counsel representing the respondent Corporation has not been able to dispute that no stay has been granted in the review petition filed in Tulsi Ram's case, this Court deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent Corporation to ensure that due and admissible arrears, if any, shall be released to the petitioner within a period of four months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. Ordered accordingly.