High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 02 P&H CK 0034

Kapoor Chand Bansal vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Augustine George Masih, J · Ashok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2246 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 403 words

Augustine George Masih, J

Petitioner has appeared in person and has put-forth his submissions that he has continuously been elected as Municipal Councillor of the Municipal

Council, Samana, District Patiala since the year 1998 and is also the President of Municipal Council, Samana continuously since 2008.

It is asserted that the petitioner is desirous of contesting elections of Municipal Councillor from Ward No.8, Samana, for which the polling station is set

up at S.S. Harbhagwan School, Samana which is the common polling station of Wards No.7 and 8 and all four polling booths of said polling station

have been declared to be hyper sensitive by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Samana vide communication No.733/Elections dated 08.01.2021

(Annexure P-1). Earlier also there had been an incident of booth capturing in the year 2015 when the elections were held and an FIR No.30 dated

25.02.2015, under Sections 117, 122, 123, 124 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 and Sections 186, 353 and 392 IPC (Annexure P-2)

was registered at Police Station City Samana, District Patiala.

There is grave apprehension with regard to the large scale disturbance and violence.

Since the petitioner belongs to the principal opposition party of the State of Punjab, he is more apprehensive of the said assertions. The intent of the

petitioner is that fair, free and impartial elections be held and for that the petitioner had highlighted his grievance by submitting a representation dated

15.01.2021 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents but till date no action thereon has been taken.

Assertion on this basis is made by the petitioner that a direction be issued to the respondents to consider the representation referred to above and take

a decision thereupon so that fair, impartial and effective elections are held to Ward No.8, from where the petitioner is intending to contest the

elections.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.4 and 5 i.e. the Deputy

Commissioner-cum-District Election Officer, Patiala and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, respectively, to look into the representation of

the petitioner dated 15.01.2021 (Annexure P-3) and take a decision thereon within a period of four days from the date of receipt of certified copy of

this order. In case some substance is found therein in the said representation, appropriate action in accordance with law be taken to ensure the

conduct of fair, free and impartial elections.