High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 MAD CK 0133

Kannan @Ganeshamoorthy vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Tharani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 120 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 551 words
1.

This appeal has been filed to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.305 of 2021 dated 23.02.2021, on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli and to grant bail to the appellant.

2.

The case against the appellant is that the appellant and others attacked the defacto complainant and her brother and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence, a case was registered against the appellant in Crime No.268 of 2020 under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. The appellant has filed a bail petition in Crl.M.P.No.305 of 2021 before the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. The petition was dismissed by the learned District Judge on 23.02.2021. Against the same, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

3.

On the side of the appellant, it is stated that the appellant is A1 in the case. There is a delay in registering the FIR. The marriage of the nephew of the appellant is held on 15.03.2021. The appellant has to perform some of the marriage rituals. The appellant is in custody from 11.02.2021 and prayed the appellant to be released on bail.

4.

On the side of the respondents 1 and 2, it is stated that the injuries are simple in nature. But the investigation is pending. If the appellant is released on bail, he might tamper the witness and the appellant is the prime accused and prayed the appeal to be dismissed.

5.

Though notice was served upon the third respondent, none appears on behalf of the third respondent.

6.

It is seen that the alleged injuries are simple in nature and the appellant is in custody for the past one month. Considering the period of incarceration and considering the nature of offence, this Criminal Appeal is allowed and the appellant is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions:

(i) the appellant shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli.

(ii) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli, may obtain a copy of any valid identity proof to ensure their identity.

(iii) On release, the appellant shall appear before the second respondent Police Station daily at 10:30 a.m, until further orders.

(iv) the appellant shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(v) the appellant shall cooperate with the investigation and the appellant shall appear before the second respondent and Court both during investigation and trial, as and when required.

(vi) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the appellant in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the appellant released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].