High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 12 BOM CK 0055

Kangana Ranaut vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Bombay High Court · Decided on 13 December 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nitin Jamdar, J · Sarang V. Kotwal, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Application No. 1009 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 188 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant states that by bare perusal of the F.I.R. and the statements stated to have been made by the complainant, offence under section 295A of the IPC is not made out.

3.

The learned Counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent No.2/Complainant and seeks time.

4.

Stand over to 25 January 2022.

5.

The learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant apprehends arrest in the light of notice received by the Applicant under section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

6.

The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions of the Investigating officer, states that no coercive steps will be taken against the Petitioner till the next date, however, the Applicant should co-operate with the investigation. The learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant will co-operate with the investigation and attend the concerned police station on 22 December 2021. The statement is accepted.

7.

We record and accept the statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, that no coercive steps will be taken against the Applicant till next date.