Tribunals and Commissions(2003) 07 NCDRC CK 0067

KANDULA VENKATESWARA RAO vs P.Govinda Rao

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 30 July 2003 · Citation: 2003 4 CPJ 338

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Ramakrishnam Raju , Mamata Lakshmanna J.
RESULT
Appeal disposed of

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 185 words
1.

THE District Forum rejected the complaint even before issuance of notice to the opposite parties on the ground that the material filed along with the complaint is not sufficient to take the complaint on file. This order is erroneous. THE question of adducing evidence will arose after notice is served on the respondents and after they filed their written version. In case the opposite parties admit the claim of the complainants, the complainants need not adduce any further evidence. THErefore, insisting that all the evidence should be filed along with the complaint is unwarranted. This order in our view cannot stand. It is accordingly set aside even before notice as the order was passed without notice to other side. Further the order is not signed by other two Members. Hence the order is not valid in the eye of law. On this count also the order has to be set aside. Accordingly the order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the District Forum for fresh disposal and it will dispose of the same in accordance with law. Appeal disposed of.