High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 08 RAJ CK 0067

Kanaram @ Kanmal vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 18 August 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Farjand Ali, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentence Application No.1009 Of 2023 In Criminal Appeal No. 1617 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 489 words

Farjand Ali, J

1.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 28.07.2023 passed by the learned Session Judge, Sirohi in Sessions Case No.11/2017 whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment of six months’ simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 15 (3) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

2.

It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court. He was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty so granted to him; hearing of the appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be granted.

3.

Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for releasing the appellant on application for suspension of sentence.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the facts that the accused-appellant was on bail during the course of trial and the hearing of appeal is likely to take further more time and considering the overall submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

6.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Session Judge, Sirohi who passed the impugned order dated 28.07.2023 in Sessions Case No.11/2017 against the appellant-applicant- Kanaram @ Kanmal S/o Shri Tulsaji shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 18.09.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

(1) That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

(2) That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.