High CourtsSingle Bench(1949) 12 MAD CK 0010

Kamala Gangalamma vs Venkatarami Reddi

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 December 1949 · Citation: AIR 1950 Mad 385 : (1950) 63 LW 66 : (1942) 55 LW 66

HON’BLE JUDGES
Panchapakesa Ayyar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 1355 and Cri. Revision Petition No. 1282 of 1948

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 134 words

Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.

Deliberate attribution of immorality falsely to a wife will certainly fall under the definition of legal cruelty and entitle a wife to live separately from

such a husband and claim separate maintenance. Chanakya, the great Prime Minister of the Mauryas, has proclaimed this more than 2200 years

ago in his Artha Sastra. In India, this kind of thing has always been considered legal cruelty though not small beatings of wife, cessation of conjugal

relations with her for long periods of Deeksha etc. So the petitioner was certainly entitled to live separately from the respondent and claim separate

maintenance from him. On the evidence I fix the quantum of maintenance at ten rupees a month payable from the date of the filing of the petition in

the lower Court by the petitioner.