Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 03 ITAT CK 3187

Kamal Joshi vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 24 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member · M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 2429/Del/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 199 words

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, arises against the CIT(A)-1 4, New Delhi’s order dated 02.01.2019 in case No. 375/17-18/CIT(A)-14, New Delhi/10391, in proceedings u/s 144 r.w.s. 148/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing that there arises the first and foremost issue of validity of the reopening itself for want of a valid approval by the learned prescribed authority u/s. 151 of the Act. The tribunal’s attention is invited to the approval date d 22.02.2016 (page 7 in paper boo k) wherein the learned prescribed authority had accepted the Asse ssing Officer’s reopening pro posal as “Yes, I endorse the………”. This being the clinching factual position emanating from the record, we hereby quote CIT vs. S. Goyanka L ime and Chemical Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 242 (SC) that such a mechanical approval vitiates the e ntire reopenings; and therefore, we accept the instant legal ground in very terms. This reopening is quashed there fore.

4.

All other pleadings on mer its stand rendered academic.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.