Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 04 NCLAT CK 0038

Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd vs Mr. Navin Khandelwal Liquidator Of Gajra Bevel Gears Limited

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 12 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Arun Baroka, Member (T)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.600 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 217 words
1.

Heard Mr. Pratik Tripathi appearing for the Appellant. This Appeal has been filed against impugned order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority by which order the application filed by the Successful Bidder in the liquidation proceeding of the Corporate Debtor seeking various reliefs and concessions has been decided. The Adjudicating Authority vide Para 6.1 of the order has granted reliefs and concessions to the extent as indicated.

2.

Appellant  challenging  the  order  contends  that  the  Adjudicating Authority failed to grant necessary concession with regard to listing of company whereas the company is a listed company. The Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order has allowed the reliefs and concessions which according to the Adjudicating Authority was necessary for the Successful Purchaser in the liquidation proceeding. The Appellant referring to the Liquidation Regulation submits that acquisition plan under liquidation is akin to resolution plan under the CIRP and said benefits should also be allowed to the Appellant.

3.

The Appellant being Successful Bidder in the Liquidation Proceeding, reliefs and concessions as permissible under the liquidation process document and the Regulation are only admissible and the Adjudicating Authority has granted the reliefs and concessions which was necessary for the Appellant to carry on the business. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. Appeal is dismissed.