High CourtsDivision Bench(1940) 02 MAD CK 0028

Kallumatam Gurubasayya vs Sanna Setra Siddalingappa

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 February 1940 · Citation: AIR 1940 Mad 677 : (1940) 51 LW 491 : (1940) 1 MLJ 689

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 112 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—The complaint is founded on an allegation in a plaint in a suit for partition and recovery of the share of the vendor of

the accused in the family properties and if the allegation is false the offence would be one u/s 193, Indian Penal Code. A complaint by the Court is

necessary for a prosecution for an offence u/s 193, Indian Penal Code and the parties cannot be permitted to evade that provision of law by filing a

complaint of defamation. In this view it is unnecessary to consider whether a prosecution at this stage is not an abuse of the process of Court and

the charge is quashed.