High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 MP CK 0129

Kallu Shah vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 15 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vishnu Pratap Singh Chauhan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.50208 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 567 words

Vishnu Pratap Singh Chauhan, J

Heard on this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in jail in connection with Crime

No.429/2020 registered at Police Station Bairasia, District Bhopal for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (n), 506, 323 and 120-B

of the IPC.

The allegation against the applicant, in short, is that marriage of the prosecutrix was solemnized with one Vijay @ Brajmohan Vishwakarma. After

marriage when prosecutrix did not conceive any child for a long time, then the husband and mother-in-law of the prosecutrix took the prosecutrix to

the present applicant-Kallu Shah Baba, who is an exorcist, with intention that he will remove all hurdles. Applicant took the prosecutrix inside the room

and outraged her modesty. Thereafter she came back at her matrimonial house and stated the incidence to her husband and mother-in-law, but they

threatened her not to disclose anything to anyone. The prosecutrix kept mum, but second time on 18.07.2020 they again called Baba. When

prosecutrix denied for that, husband of the prosecutrix beat her and forced her to go with present applicant-Kallu Shah Baba. Applicant took her inside

the room and did some exorcist work. It is alleged that applicant touched and inserted finger in her private part. Thereafter, she narrated whole story

to her brother and lodged this report.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, applicant has falsely been implicated in the case. Prosecutrix settled the matter with co-accused

(husband of the prosecutrix) and filed a compromise application before the trial court, which is supported by affidavit of the prosecutrix. It is also

submitted that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant is trial will take considerable time, therefore, it has been prayed that the

applicant may be released on bail.

 Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the application.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. On perusal of record it reflects that husband and mother-in-law of the prosecutrix

took the prosecutrix to the present applicant for doing some exorcist work.

Prosecutrix is major lady. There is delay in filing FIR. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, considering the settlement

arrived at between the prosecutrix and co-accused, as also considering the age of the applicant who is more than 65 years and looking to the present

situation of Covid-19, this Court is inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.

 Consequently, this application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on behalf of applicant-Kallu Shah, stands allowed.

 It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with

one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all dates fixed in the case and for

complying with the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

 This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

 Jail authorities and State Government are directed to follow the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry in the wake of Novel Corona Virus, before

and after releasing the applicant.

 Certified copy as per rules.