High CourtsDivision Bench(1908) 09 MAD CK 0003

Kalidindi Ramaraju and Others vs Gadiraju Narasimharaju and Others Sayyapa Raju, Chinna Thirupathi Raju Vs Kalidindi Ramaraju and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 28 September 1908 · Citation: 4 Ind. Cas. 1109

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pinhey, J · Munro, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 229 words
1.

The father of the plaintiffs agreed under Ex. III to sell the property to the father of the defendants Nos. 1 to 3 and received Rs. 200 out of the

sale price of Rs. 600 agreed upon. Before the sale was completed the plaintiffs'' father died. The plaintiffs'' mother then sold the property in

pursuance of Ex. III and received the balance Rs. 400 of the purchase money. It is found that the sale was not for purposes binding on the minors.

The plaintiffs now sue to recover the property and the Subordinate Judge has given them a decree for four-fifths of the property. The question is

whether the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover the whole property on refunding the Rs. 200,earnest money. In our opinion they are; by Ex. III no

interest in the property passed--section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act--and on the death of their father the whole property went to the

plaintiffs by survivorship. The sale by their mother was not binding on them. We, therefore, in modification of the Subordinate Judge''s decree, give

the plaintiffs a decree with costs here and in the lower appellate Court for the whole property on condition of their re-paying the sum of Rs. 200.

2.

Decree modified.

3.

In S.A. 293 of 1906.

4.

The decree is right. The second appeal is dismissed with costs.