High CourtsDivision Bench(1892) 11 CAL CK 0002

Kali Dassi vs Durga Charan Naik

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 November 1892 · Citation: (1893) ILR (Cal) 351

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prinsep, J · Ghose, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 118 words

Prinsep and Ghose, JJ.—Proceedings under Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be conducted as in a summary trial under Chapter XXII. The evidence should be recorded as provided by Section 355. It is therefore impossible to form any opinion on the proceedings of the Magistrate or the correctness of his order. We observe that the Magistrate in the explanation called for by the Sessions Judge states that "in these simple and very common cases I do not record much of the evidence." In this case he has recorded none at all. Consequently a Court of revision is unable to satisfy itself that the order is a proper order. The case must therefore be properly tried.