High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 12 MAD CK 0016

Kaki Mutyalu vs Kanigolla Siva Raghavayya

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 December 1915 · Citation: 32 Ind. Cas. 826 : (1916) 3 LW 163

HON’BLE JUDGES
William Ayling, J · Phillips, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 150 words
1.

The appellant points out that Exhibit J, on which the decision of the lower Appellate Court very largely proceeds, has been admitted by the

Subordinate Judge contrary to the provisions of Order XLI, Rule 27, of the Civil Procedure Code.

2.

No application is on record for the admission of this document in the Subordinate Court: no reasons for its admission have been recorded as

required by Clause (2) of the rule above quoted: and the respondent''s Vakil is unable to suggest even now any reason to explain the plaintiff''s

failure to produce this document in the original Court, or any ground which would have justified the lower Appellate Court in receiving it.

3.

The judgment of the lower Appellate Court reverses that of the District Munsif.

4.

We must set aside the decree of the Subordinate Judge and remand the appeal for re-hearing and disposal according to law.